Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you can Person Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area off attachment in the people mating. Summary of Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Sites contradiction reviewed. Log out-of Personal Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A personal tech you to decreases public wedding and psychological really-are? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Sphere, J. M. (2001). Number, time, and you will lifetime of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Newest Society Accounts, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research off closeness, passions, and commitment: Comparison the fresh new presumptions of your own triangular theory from like. Mental Reports, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Feeling finest on doing even worse: Personal reviews in this romantic dating. Journal regarding Identity and you may Social Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The latest implicit knowledge away from personal rivalry. Diary out of Identity and Public Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
A great. (2001)mitment and matchmaking repairs elements
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you glamorous alternatives: The newest advanced therapy from matchmaking repairs. Advancement and you may Individual Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential research off disagreement and you can agreement inside disturb and you can nondistressed relationship people. Journal out-of Asking and you will Scientific Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Environmentally friendly, An effective. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Matchmaking formation online: What’s the huge interest? Record away from Social Points, 58(1), 9–29.
The benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization and the design from pleasure in intimate dating
Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-evaluation objectives when you look at the romantic dating: A style of in the https://getbride.org/da/guatemalanske-kvinder/ world enhancement and you will certain confirmation. Inside P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Knowledge ents regarding examination of few communication (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-therapist thread from contact out-of attachment idea. Psychotherapy: Concept, Research, Habit, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New societal overseeing program: Increased sensitivity to help you societal signs because an adaptive reaction to public exception to this rule. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new social outcast: Ostracism, personal exemption, getting rejected, and intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Therapy Press.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). In the world and particular relational models throughout the contact with social relations. Journal regarding Character and you may Societal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Connection and you can recommendations seeking when you look at the romantic relationship. Personality and you may Public Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and particular accessory representations in the adulthood: Is there a relationship?. Log Of Societal And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Inside J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal close relationship: Fix and you may improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A. D. (2000). Projection yourself impression certainly spouses because the a purpose of the newest similarity within shared event. Personality And you may Personal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience regarding extrinsic advantages on the liking and you can enjoying. Diary of Personality and Societal Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.
Leave A Comment